Here are a few of our clients and partners for whom we
have delivered bespoke research and change initiatives all of them
realising demonstrable organisation, social or individuals’
betterment. But then, you wouldn’t expect us to cite projects that
didn’t go exactly to plan, would you ? However, we do believe
things can only truly progress if we all “fail quick and learn
fast” so we are obliged to share this learning with you in our
reflections section of the narrative
A few of these examples are revealed in the following sections.
This is merely stimulus, being a simple and easy to read list of
the kind of the initiatives we deliver and, maybe, show how we can
help you with the problem you are about to wrestle
with.
-Master Panning
-Spatial/Workplace Review – Private Sector
-Project delivery methodology
-Project Delivery reviews
-Delivering a Client’s Brief - Public Sector
-Project Start up – Private Sector
-Project Start-up 3rd Sector
-A FM restructure – Public Sector
-Workplace readiness for change interventions
-FM Restructure – Private Sector
-FM Operating Models and Opportunity costs
-Procurement and Client:Suppier relations
-Spatial Review – Public Sector
-Changing Carbon and Energy Consumptions
-Critical Friend; change management, coaching and mentoring
-Learning and development – nontechnical training
-Learning and Development – technical training
Our strategic metamodel forms a research framework to structure organisational centric workspace statistics and then evaluate the impact of the workplace upon the organisation. At the heart of the concept is translating the business mission and vision into workplace objective and then comparing these with the research observations revealed by amalgamating people, production and property data, this will then begin to define the current strategic position. Only then do we add further data to research aspects such as customers, demographics and connectivity which will then expose the strategic choices available and so reveal the options and allow a robust business case to be generated. This then leads to a considered and result orientated action (or indeed inaction) which can be measured and evaluated.
We deliver bespoke and boutique research and change programmes because we recognise that all clients have bespoke characteristics and needs. So, we have used variants of this model with many clients. Some successful outcome includes:
-Refresh the UK estate strategy during the merger of two financial services organisations this resulted in a programme which was aimed to support the business change required by the merger and secondly realise a 20% saving in workspace, whilst at the same time improved the quality of workplace
-Design of a masterplan for a service provider whom had won a large government contact, this resulted in relocation within three UK cities aimed at workplace rebranding to support the humanistic aspect of the change along with modern ways of working and a large reduction in property cost to meet the financial challenges of the new contract.
It is amazing, when amalgamated data enables an organisation to “realise what it already knows”. It is astounding when an organisation evaluates data to understand and “know what it doesn’t know”. But the real magic only occurs when this knowledge is converted into wisdom to realise positive change which is designed and crafted from a declared possible future
Working with an international technology company we were asked to inform their “better ways of working” programme. This involved, amongst other things, detailed survey and analysis of data from; building opex and KPIs, Great Place to Work, Employee. We also generated further data from; survey of employees, interviews with senior managers and workshops with individual teams. This provided our client with a fresh detailed understanding of the workplace requirements
The output from our consultation was a robust evidence base insight that informed and underpinned the next stage of detailed design and space planning of their head office. This was also used during the procurement and appointment of a workplace designer/contractor to ensure the contracted outcomes where robustly detailed, articulated and understood, getting the project off to the best possible start. Our work was then used to empower our client to carryout workshops and internal conversations with teams about how they could increase productivity and user satisfaction more effectively in the future.
We were retained by the client for the duration of the fitout project and change programme as a Trusted Advisor and mentor to ensure the business benefits were realised.
The work exposed how easily the FM/Estates department can be perceived as a service provider to the organisation and over time how a organisational barrier can develop.
This brief was to design and sets out a clear mechanism to significantly strengthen the engagement structures supporting the strategic relationships within a councils Local Enterprise Partnerships and the Local Strategic Partnership. The principles on which the engagement mechanism to be developed were focussed on maximising investment opportunities within the locality.
To deliver we appraised; the current funding backlog, project delivery methodology and then held interviews and focus groups with key stakeholders.
The research revealed the areas requiring change included;
The new process was created and embedded which freed the
funding backlog and lead to speedier and more efficient project
delivery.
Large public-sector organisations are designed to last, they have robust and very onerous procedures along with all those authorisation protocols. Being part of this system, it sometimes becomes difficult to appreciate the real cost of this burden. It is very human trait to build a strategy to survive within these systems constraints rather than reflect and challenge how effective (or current and relevant) the processes are. It is only when the key stakeholder has undergone this paradigm shift that newly streamlined processes and technology will be adopted.
We were appointed following the catastrophically failure of a
change project to migrate a print/post solution to a 3rd party
provider during an estates reconfiguration. The brief was to
recover the migration, but the challenges were complicated;
technology, processes, products and a client:contractor:supplier
relationship.
We introduced a short “taking stock” period and applied a simple
project health checker. This began to expose a structural
difference between client and contractor and a mismatch in
resourcing and planning levels. This learning informed several
workshops and planning sessions with all parties.
We exposed flaws in the project methodology and the prevailing conventional wisdom. The perceived technical complexity of the project was sound and proven, and not the supposed root cause of the issue. Instead, project plans were weak with different versions of project control and product descriptors being used by different parties. Exposing these project and technical issues also revealed a contractual issues and a cascading blame culture (client to contractor and contractor to supplier)
We introduced sensible delivery and change procedures and re-programmed the testing, acceptance and transitions timeline of the products. We also introduced a restructure to the project delivery team, this removed the blame culture and guaranteed the original contractual commitments and migration programme could be met … indeed it was bettered.
All the parties had created slightly different realities based
on their differing context, positions, power and technical
knowledge. Simply put, the fog needed to be lifted to enable the
genuine insight to be exposed. With great insight the technical and
procedural issues can quite easy be defined to reveal the true
wisdom. Armed with this fresh wisdom then the generation and
application of the remedies required became speedy and
simple.
The brief was to assist a large university who had won a partner
role in a large international research project.
The universities existing estate was large with surplice space
available for the new research team. However, the research space
being made available to this new project was obsolete, isolated and
poor-quality.
Appointed by the research Project Lead we were commissioned to
review the space available with an external and somewhat critical
eye.
Surveying the space we generated a robust weighted option matrix based on the Purpose, People, Processes , Place and Price. From this we could gain consensus on the preferred option and then build a conceptual layout, size the workspace requirements, and build a business case to deliver the workplace.
There were many learning points from this assignment, the main
points we have taken are away from this gig are;
Workplace in the broadest sense is an enabler to organisational
ways of working, change and success. Workspace is different to
workplace on many levels, a useful way to articulate this is to
consider came from this assignment;
This organisation was world class at delivering capital projects and the physical space. However, over the years this had become somewhat of their winning strategy and therefore evolved ways of working , ways of thinking and ways of problem solving. When these ways of working are questioned and challenged then the organisation and people who own them feel threatened and become defensive. This is major obstacle to overcome and should receive the same amount of design and planning which is awarded to all those drawings, Gantt chars and costing models.
A leisure park had recognised that the 750M2 glazed roof
covering an essential and iconic feature of their offer, need to be
replaced. A similar project at one of their other locations
resulted in high cost project, which over run and had negative
operational impact causing considerable guest dissatisfaction. So,
they were eager to do this project differently.
We were engaged to take the project through the start-up phase
and to ensure the project was set up for success ensuring that the
disruption and cost consequents of the previous project were not
replicated.
Armed with a business case for the project we engaged with the
executive team and the park management to ensure the internal roles
and accountabilities were appropriate by design and understood by
all. We then challenged the design, technology and external supply
chain.
The organisation and owners were brave enough to then embark on a
two-stage tender to facilitate the testing and engaging of a
principal contractor early. With all the stakeholder then enrolled
and the new environment of innovation and problem solving
established we delivered a solution which was
* 50% of the cost of their pervious project – by area
* Delivered on time
* Minimal guest impact
* Became and high-profile project used to positively engage staff
and guests
* Resulted in a feature that is loved by guest and staff
alike!
It was very refreshing to work with such a forward-thinking
organisation, who were keen not to replicate the problems from the
past.
A children’s hospice had decided to take the bold strategic
decision to raise the age ceiling of the children they support. The
consequences of this decision revealed the need for a “transition
service” for children/young-adults to flow into the adult
palliative care system. This transition service needed to be
quantified and understood.
We qualitatively and quantitatively measured the existing space
and ways of working, then we delivered workshop with staff,
children and families, along with a review of peer hospices. This
enabled the project to be defined to meet the forecasted
growth in the families that the charity would now need to support,
and more so the changes in the type of support they would need to
provide and how they could provide this support.
We then generated business plans along with new build cost plans
with associated layouts. Our work was presented to, and ratified
by, the board of trustees and we were asked to take the initiative
through the start-up phase.
We devised a workstream approach to frame the project through, and
beyond, the start-up phase. Actively engaging with the fundraising
workstream we dovetailed key measurables into the funding
agreements. We then ran a procurement exercise to engage the
professional team. With all the project critical success factors
devised and agreed with key stakeholders, processes to meet and
measure the project deliverables and also the professional team in
place and motivated, the project was in the best possible shape for
success.
The design of the new build and the new service required research, stakeholder engagement and innovation- it was after all a brand-new service offer for the hospice. However, the most challenging and rewarding aspect of the project was managing the relationship between the trust and the sole funder. Managing the expectation of two organisations from different sectors with procedures, policies, outlooks, aspirations and language which are in some cases diametrically opposed was the key to setting the project up for success, and ensuring that should any future issue arise it would be smoothly resolved.
A large university’s new VC along with the Director of Campus
Services required an independent opinion on the structure and
efficiency of their FM service provision.
Although the department was performing to expected standard when
compared with peer universities in the HE benchmarking exercises,
it was clear that the directorate (and their supply chain) had
suffered from under investment for several years. Engaging with the
senior management team we exposed their true aspirations, this then
formed the datum to measure the directorates actual delivery and
service outcomes.
The directorate needed to embark on a transformational change and
the senior team were very keen to take on this change.
However, the operational environment imposed by the organisation
(and the larger sector) made it impossible to adopt true
transformational change techniques – to embark on this journey
would be a fool’s errand.
We designed a series of “games” (controlled and measurable
interventions) which when combined would achieve the transformation
required but in a controlled and achievable manner where feedback
and learning could be harvested.
Where required and where appropriate, we worked with the university
over a number of years to design and deliver;
1 restructure of the senior management team – achieving clarity of
accountabilities and 30% reduction in cost
2 consolidation of soft service contracts – refreshing the
services and management approach and also achieving >£2m saving
over the contract term
3 Generated the business plan
4 a host of minor initiative, including refresh and retender of the
digital print offer, consolidation of time tabling controls,
bespoke training for customer experience etc.
Phew !!
The starting point with this client was also an ‘orientation’
workshop with their leadership team. After a second workshop with
participants from across the organisation we compared and aligned
all the workshop data with the Client’s annual Great Place to Work
results. This helped to uncover some challenging truths about the
Client’s workplace, providing deeper insight to the executive group
around the synergy between culture, workspace and
workplace.
I am a text block. Click on me to drag me around or click a corner handle to resize me. Click the settings icon (it's the left one, looks like a cog) to change this text. You can type new text into me or cut and paste text from somewhere else. Click outside of me when you're done and any changes will be saved.
I am a text block. Click on me to drag me around or click a
corner handle to resize me. Click the settings icon (it's the left
one, looks like a cog) to change this text. You can type new text
into me or cut and paste text from somewhere else. A large tech
company was restructuring the internal team responsible for their
estates and data centres, this included amalgamating hard and soft
services along with H&S, business continuity and environmental
management.
Click outside of me when you're done and any changes will be
saved.
I am a text block. Click on me to drag me around or click a corner handle to resize me. Click the settings icon (it's the left one, looks like a cog) to change this text. You can type new text into me or cut and paste text from somewhere else. Click outside of me when you're done and any changes will be saved.
We carried out desktop reviews, personal and team profiling and
then designed and delivered workshops with the various teams. The
outcomes enabled the desired model to be critiqued and costed along
with generating an implementation plan.
We pride ourselves on our professionalism, honesty, trust and
respect. Therefore, we could not merely report back what the client
wanted to hear – we had to “call out” that this particular emperor
had no clothes on. Armed with the findings of our work we
could articulate the personnel, service and financial risk of
implementing the desired structure, and offered alternatives. The
executive considered our findings and a new approach was selected
and successfully implemented.
The provision of an organisation’s property can have many
operating models – Lease:Freehold, Inhouse:Outsource, Input:Output
specifications etc etc etc. Our industry seems to bounce between
the extremes of operating models dictated principally by the latest
fads and trends. These transitions come at a considerable cost to
the organisation , and a cost which is much more that the input
financial costs - when will we learn that one size doesn’t fit all.
Maybe we should stop being lured by the comfort of copying
operating models and be brave enough to leap-frog them
A merger of two financial organisations had been executed
without fully investigating and understanding how the estates
operating models could be merged. The procuring organisation’s way
of working was obviously the preferred operating model we were
asked to validate this approach
An intensive desktop review was carried out and a review of
service quality and performance of the staff occupying the
different sites.
The review proved that if the preferred operating model was adopted
then there would be a like for like increase in operating costs and
possible reduction in quality and occupiers experience. This was
contrary to the findings of the pre-merger due diligence exercise.
However, our work also showed that if the alternative operating
model was applied to the parent’s UK estate then there was an
opportunity to reduce property opex by 0.75M pa year on year, and
also increase occupiers experience.
WOW !!
Positive Sums ltd. Registered in England and Wales, Company Number 8916931